On 6/4/08, openehr-technical-request at openehr.org < openehr-technical-request at openehr.org> wrote: > > > The result of this is that new _versions_ of officially released > archetypes should be very low in number and should always have a formal > definition of how to migrate data created using an older version. > > > - thomas
In subversion there are a number of versions of archetypes - are any officially released or are all considered under development? dev\adl\openehr\ehr\entry\observation\openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.blood_pressure.v1.adl dev-uk-nhs\adl\openehr\ehr\entry\observation\openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.blood_pressure.v3.adl dev-uk-nhs\adl\openehr\ehr\entry\observation\openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.blood_pressure.v2.adl dev-uk-nhs\adl\openehr\ehr\entry\observation\openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.blood_pressure.v1.adl The NHS directory has many more templates which would be nice to use. thanks! Greg http://www.patientos.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080604/6b18254a/attachment.html>
