Hi! On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 06:23, Heath Frankel < heath.frankel at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > > However, others may not be so keen on this as those starting out with > openEHR like to use the built-in development tools in their favourite IDE > to generate classes that match the AM/RM and automatically serialize data. >
Yes. Please do not exclude the current verbose RM-mimicking XML-formats from a future version update since they certainly have a value too. They are for example very nice when you want to map AQL to xPath (and xQuery) and for generating stubs in programming languages. Is there anything stopping us from having more than one serialization alternative per formalism, e.g. both verbose and compact XML? Best regards, Erik Sundvall erik.sundvall at liu.se http://www.imt.liu.se/~erisu/ Tel: +46-13-286733 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20111114/b92687db/attachment.html>
