Well that may be true but government agencies and companies will want to know that no one has recourse to legal action if they use an archetype.
Cheers Sam Sent from my phone On 09/09/2011, at 8:21 AM, Timothy Cook <timothywayne.cook at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 16:54, Sam Heard <sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com> > wrote: >> Hi Tom >> >> It is normal practice with CC to include clarifications and the whole >> structure of the license is designed to do this. >> >> Let's stay with the issue of how we stop someone copyrighting and charging >> for a specialised archetype? Or a template that is fundamental to health >> care (like an antenatal visit)? > > Maybe that isn't such a bad thing. They are only roping themselves > into their own corner. > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
