Right - I forgot to say: copyright always has to be held somewhere. Copyright has nothing to do with proprietariness - go see W3C specs - all open, all copyrighted (to a responsible open organisation).
- thomas On 20/02/2012 23:02, Seref Arikan wrote: > Hi William, > You've got me confused a bit. > > From the http://www.hl7.org/legal/ippolicy.cfm : > > ".../ > / > > /*This authorization is provided only during the years when the > appropriate HL7 Organizational Membership dues are paid, and if and > only if:*/ > > 1. /HL7 is clearly identified as publisher and *holder of the > copyright*; and,..../" > > > So if openEHR is proprietary because the foundation is holding the > copyright, is not HL7 the same according to the statement above? > > Kind regards > Seref* > * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/d70fd373/attachment.html>
