I have posted an openEHR 2.x flavoured model I created for early CIMI use here <http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/openEHR+2.x+RM+-+CIMI+version+1>, as I am on the RM committee in CIMI, and they wanted something ASAP. I have not had time to discuss this model with anyone, and it should not be regarded as having any special status in openEHR. I would encourage ongoing discussion here of the proposals for openEHR 2.x.
Note that CIMI's scope is simpler than ours: they just want a model with semantics to support creation of ADL/AOM and (ultimately) UML archetypes with a view to a) being able to build good quality archetypes (hence the interest in openEHR) and b) being able to translate these models to target implementation models like CDA, VA FHIM and so on. A simplifying factor is that CIMI can ignore legacy openEHR software, and try to start from the best possible model today. In openEHR we need to be more careful: we are concerned with building software from the RM, as well as downstream software artefact generation from archetypes and templates, and of course with existing openEHR software and data. (I have argued in CIMI that they should do this as well, just in a demonstration mode, as proof that the RM and archetypes are working as intended). Accordingly, the changes I have done to make this model are not exactly the same ones I would make to a real openEHR 2.x proposal. - thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120402/3ef53dd7/attachment.html>
