Hi Tom,
That sounds really nice.
Regards
Mikael
From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: den 29 april 2013 12:33
To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: New ADL/AOM proposals to solve some old problems
On 29/04/2013 09:01, Mikael Nystr?m wrote:
Hi Tom,
Is the intention that the new data type TERMINOLOGY_CODE also can contain a
post-coordinated code so it, for example, can contain a expression in SNOMED CT
compositional grammar? (See
www.snomed.org/tig?t=rfg_expression_scg<http://www.snomed.org/tig?t=rfg_expression_scg>
for more details about SNOMED CT compositional grammar.)
yes exactly. Technically I suppose it should be called TERMINOLOGY_CODE_PHRASE
or TERMINOLOGY_CODE_STRING or something like that. It's the same idea as the
openEHR CODE_PHRASE, the point here is to have an AOM type that is minimal, and
just can represent a basic constrainable terminology code idea, and be easily
mapped to actual RMs.
- thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130429/fd552c9f/attachment.html>
