Hi
ACTIVITY has a field for timing.  It's datatype is parsable.
Some archetypes use a CLUSTER archetype to define detailed timing information 
for the given ACTIVITY.

I am curious if anyone have experiences with implementing timing for Activity 
and which strategy you are using?
Will detailed timing information in a CLUSTER make timing information on 
Activity obsolete? Or will detailed timing information on Activity remove the 
need for a timing CLUSTER?



Bj?rn N?ss
Product Owner
DIPS ASA

Mobil +47 93 43 29 10<tel:+47%2093%2043%2029%2010>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130810/16f20e7c/attachment-0001.html>

Reply via email to