On 09/05/2013 09:38 AM, Diego Bosc? wrote:
> II would say that you just have to attach the remaining path from 
> target node to the use_node path, so I would say first option is the 
> right one

That seems to me the most logical too.

Thanks, Diego!

Bert
>
>
>
>
> 2013/9/5 Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl <mailto:bert.verhees at 
> rosa.nl>>
>
>     Hi All,
>
>     We had a discussion about data-pointds being identified by
>     archetype-path, not  archetypenode-id.
>     I agree with that, but I am a bit confused how to do following.
>
>     consider following fantasy archetype
>
>     ------------------------------------------
>
>         Entry[at0000] matches {    -- Encounter
>             attribute1 matches {
>                 SECTION[at0003] occurrences matches {0..1} matches {
>                     items  cardinality matches {0..*} matches {
>                         ITEM_LIST[at0007] occurrences matches {0..1}
>     matches {
>                             items existence matches {0..1} cardinality
>     matches {0..*; unordered; unique} matches {
>                                 ELEMENT[at0008] occurrences matches
>     {0..1} matches {
>                                     value matches {
>                                         DV_TEXT occurrences matches
>     {1..1} matches {
>                                             value matches {/abc/}
>                                         }
>                                     }
>                                 }
>                             }
>                         }
>                     }
>                 }
>             }
>             attribute3 matches {
>                 use_node ITEM_LIST /attribute1[at0003]/items[at0007]
>             }
>             attribute4 matches {
>                 use_node ITEM_LIST[at0005]
>     /attribute1[at0003]/items[at0007]
>             }
>
>     ------------------------------------------
>
>     Now I want to know the path in the three ways to the data-point of
>     value of DV_TEXT
>
>     Which one is right, or are all wrong?
>
>     [archetype_id]/attribute1[at0003]/items[at0007]/items[at0008]/value/value
>     [archetype_id]/attribute3/items[at0008]/value/value
>     [archetype_id]/attribute4[at0005]/items[at0008]/value/value
>
>     or we have this (repeat the targetpath also in the path to the
>     data-point)
>
>     [archetype_id]/attribute1[at0003]/items[at0007]/items[at0008]/value/value
>     [archetype_id]/attribute3/items[at0007]/items[at0008]/value/value
>     [archetype_id]/attribute4[at0005]/items[at0007]/items[at0008]/value/value
>
>     or is it like this (repeat the complete path of the targetpath)
>
>     [archetype_id]/attribute1[at0003]/items[at0007]/items[at0008]/value/value
>     
> [archetype_id]/attribute3/attribute1[at0003]/items[at0007]/items[at0008]/value/value
>     
> [archetype_id]/attribute4[at0005]/attribute1[at0003]/items[at0007]/items[at0008]/value/value
>
>     Thanks very much
>
>     Bert
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     openEHR-technical mailing list
>     openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
>     <mailto:openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org>
>     
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130905/e1bdc753/attachment.html>

Reply via email to