On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 08:52:28AM +0000, Koray Atalag wrote: > Another point is, although I haven't been practicing > Medicine for too long now, I know the links between problems > vs goals vs actions do not play nicely at all times - indeed > for most of the time. They can be subjective and quite error > prone. Therefore I don't think 'natural order' (as in DMBS) > of an EHR cannot be of POMR type - it has to follow real > life: randomness and episodicity.
Problem orientation is -- of course -- a best-effort approach. An EHR which "forces" problem orientation facilitates good care by making clinicians think about what things really mean. What is meant by "randomness" ? "Episodicity" does not at all run counter to problem orientation. Karsten Hilbert -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
