Grahame,

thanks for this, it's very useful. Some questions...

*Controlling Conformance*: CC-0 just means 'public domain', no 
copyright. How do you exert any kind of control (which you mention) over 
the conformance not being messed with? Is it just that 'FHIR' is stamped 
on everything, and trademark protection actually defines the rights of 
use? In which case, aren't we talking about some other piece of legalese 
to do with the trademark, that defines when something could have a 
'FHIR' trademark on it?

*Copyright*: I don't see any harm in having a copyright notice if the 
original author(ity) demands it, e.g. Nehta is like this. Copyright is 
kind of useless in the land of software and formal models anyway, it's 
the licence that counts.

*Attribution*: Current thinking has been that if archetypes are 
copyrighted to whomever, the licence-to-use would require attribution, 
which just means listing authors. I think the value here is that 
artefact users know that wide consultation and expertise went into the 
artefact. Consider for example the BP archetype in CKM:



Would't that 'contributors' list disappear under the new FHIR approach? 
I think that would be a problem for openEHR - the contributors list is 
the main way that users can get some idea of the quality of the thing.


- thomas

On 02/10/2014 14:05, Grahame Grieve wrote:
> hi
>
>> we should certainly examine the discussions you have had in FHIR-land.
> The discussions were all private threads, but I can give you a summary
> run down. We start with our plain english license:
>
> * FHIR is ? and ? HL7. The right to maintain FHIR remains vested in HL7
> * You can redistribute FHIR
> * You can create derivative specifications or implementation-related
> products and services
> * Derivative Specifications cannot redefine what conformance to FHIR means
> * You can't claim that HL7 or any of its members endorses your derived
> [thing] because it uses content from this specification
> * Neither HL7 nor any of the contributors to this specification accept
> any liability for your use of FHIR
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141002/a98aaddf/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bejcgidi.png
Type: image/png
Size: 44922 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141002/a98aaddf/attachment-0001.png>

Reply via email to