On 31-10-14 09:21, Thomas Beale wrote: >> I know, that's why I asked if it is feasible to incorporate this or >> at least something similar in the transitional 1.4+ since it seems a >> very important characteristic. >> > > yes, undoubtedly. I will start a wiki page to try and tease out > changes to reverse engineer from ADL 2 into a new ADL 1.5, 1.6 etc. > But I'll rely mostly on input of others on this, so this suggestion > needs to go there, and any others you have. I would favor this change, so if there would be a voting, I would vote yes. I was missing this feature, so I always managed it to handle it by misusing text/description. According http://semver.org/ it would become 1.5: MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards-compatible manner
Bert
