On 13/04/2016 14:45, Seref Arikan wrote:
Hi Tom,
Very interesting. Good to see Intermountain tackling wflow. Especially
the idea of adaptive wflows is intriguing. Cooperative category sounds
like a true challenge.
Inevitable questions follow:
Any specs out there? Any code? A shared space for comments/Qs/Chat?
it's coming ;-)
This literature / activity survey is part of getting those first specs
and examples together. I have seen working code BTW, but they want to
refine it a bit further before making it visible.
Comments:
I have long thought that workflows were underutilized in hcare due to
attempts to model them either at a too formal level (petri
nets,colored petri nets or such) or at a too simple level that could
not handle the complexity of healthcare. Something thought
specifically for the domain may do really well. I remember studying
process mining and delta analysis with the aim of analyzing existing
workflows to see how much they deviate from clinical guidelines, but
that dream died at one point :) A healthcare specific computable
workflow could allow a lot of interesting things. Hope this one takes
off.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
