This should be used as the name at least then

2017-04-25 10:08 GMT+02:00 <michael.law...@csiro.au>:

>
> There is a spec that tells you how to identify different editions and
> versions of SNOMED CT - see http://snomed.org/uri
>
> In short, http://snomed.info/sct is the identifier for any version of
> SNOMED CT.  for the Norway extension you need to know which module it is in
> (this is what will be used in the Module Dependency Reference Set for the
> Norway release) and then, if it was 12345668 for example, the identifier is
> http://snomed.info/sct/12345678
>
> Michael
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 25 Apr 2017, at 5:52 pm, Diego Boscá <yamp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think having this in a hardcoded terminology list is probably far from
> ideal (e.g. how do you put "snomed ct+norway national extension"? do we
> need an exhaustive listing of all possible extensions/versions?)
>
> 2017-04-25 8:03 GMT+02:00 Ian McNicoll <i...@freshehr.com>:
>
>> SNOMED-CT is the official designator, based on the archetype editor
>> terminology list.
>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 at 06:36, Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulations about the new adoption!
>>>
>>> The IHTSDO recommends to use exactly "SNOMED CT" as the *name*, in our
>>> specs we are using SNOMED-CT as the name (it should be corrected to the
>>> name preferred by the IHTSDO). On an event they explicitly asked to avoid
>>> the SNOMED-CT with the hyphen when referencing the standard.
>>>
>>> As for the term id, I've seen [snomed-ct::35917007 on the specs, or
>>> SNOMED-CT on sample archetypes: https://github.com/openEHR/spe
>>> cifications-ITS/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=snomed&type=
>>>
>>> Tested on the Ocean's archetype editor and they use:
>>>
>>> constraint_bindings = <
>>>         ["SNOMED-CT"] = <
>>>             items = <
>>>                 ["ac0001"] = <terminology:SNOMED-CT/release
>>> ?subset=cabolabs>
>>>             >
>>>         >
>>>     >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Bjørn Næss <b...@dips.no> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Norway just became a SNOMED country.
>>>>
>>>> One simple question – what is the correct terminologyId to use for
>>>> SNOMED-CT.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Currently we use ‘SNOMEDCT’ like below. Is this correct?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  <value xsi:type="DV_CODED_TEXT">
>>>>                     <value>Høyre øye</value>
>>>>                     <defining_code>
>>>>                       <terminology_id>
>>>>                         <value>SNOMEDCT</value>
>>>>                       </terminology_id>
>>>>                       <code_string>18944008</code_string>
>>>>                     </defining_code>
>>>>                   </value>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vennlig hilsen
>>>> Bjørn Næss
>>>> Produktansvarlig
>>>> DIPS ASA
>>>>
>>>> Mobil +47 93 43 29 10 <+47%2093%2043%2029%2010>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>> openEHR-implementers mailing list
>>>> openehr-implement...@lists.openehr.org
>>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implemente
>>>> rs_lists.openehr.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez
>>> Cel:(00598) 99 043 145
>>> Skype: cabolabs
>>> <http://cabolabs.com/>
>>> http://www.cabolabs.com
>>> pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com
>>> Subscribe to our newsletter <http://eepurl.com/b_w_tj>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_
>>> lists.openehr.org
>>
>> --
>> Ian McNicoll
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_
>> lists.openehr.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> [image: VeraTech for Health SL] <https://htmlsig.com/t/000001C268PZ>
>
> [image: Twitter]  <https://htmlsig.com/t/000001C47QQH> [image: LinkedIn]
> <https://htmlsig.com/t/000001C4DPJG> [image: Maps]
> <https://htmlsig.com/t/000001BZTWS7>
>
> Diego Boscá Tomás / Senior developer
> diebo...@veratech.es
> yamp...@gmail.com
>
> VeraTech for Health SL
> +34 961071863 <+34%20961%2007%2018%2063> / +34 627015023
> <+34%20627%2001%2050%2023>
> www.veratech.es
>
> Su dirección de correo electrónico junto a sus datos personales forman
> parte de un fichero titularidad de VeraTech for Health SL (CIF B98309511)
> cuya finalidad es la de mantener el contacto con usted. Conforme a La Ley
> Orgánica 15/1999, usted puede ejercitar sus derechos de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y, en su caso oposición, enviando una solicitud
> por escrito a verat...@veratech.es.
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> technical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-
> technical_lists.openehr.org
>



-- 

[image: VeraTech for Health SL] <https://htmlsig.com/t/000001C268PZ>

[image: Twitter]  <https://htmlsig.com/t/000001C47QQH> [image: LinkedIn]
<https://htmlsig.com/t/000001C4DPJG> [image: Maps]
<https://htmlsig.com/t/000001BZTWS7>

Diego Boscá Tomás / Senior developer
diebo...@veratech.es
yamp...@gmail.com

VeraTech for Health SL
+34 961071863 <+34%20961%2007%2018%2063> / +34 627015023
<+34%20627%2001%2050%2023>
www.veratech.es

Su dirección de correo electrónico junto a sus datos personales forman
parte de un fichero titularidad de VeraTech for Health SL (CIF B98309511)
cuya finalidad es la de mantener el contacto con usted. Conforme a La Ley
Orgánica 15/1999, usted puede ejercitar sus derechos de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y, en su caso oposición, enviando una solicitud
por escrito a verat...@veratech.es.
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to