Hi all, First of all, I largely agree with Heather re the current approach. At freshEHR, we generally try to maximise the use of international 'semantic' archetypes, including scales, scores etc but accept that this is often not necessary and that there is place for simply modelling aspects of the questionnaire as-is.
Commercially, I am interested in how we might make use of , or at worst, play nicely with the FHIR Questionnaire resources. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 5 June 2017 at 10:05, GF <gf...@luna.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > A few of generic ideas around the question-answer pair. > > There are several kinds of question-answer pairs: > - The general generic pattern is the pair: question - answer; > - The questionnaire can be one or more question-answer pairs; > - The questions can be locally defined or regionally, nationally, > internationally used; > - Answers can be* free text*, *quantitative* (number, code), > *semi-quantitative* (derived from a categorised set of possible answers > using inclusion and exclusion criteria) or *qualitative* (present, not > present); > - Answers can be aggregated by means of category, mathematical formula. > > This list of kinds of questionnaires ranges from simple to very complex > patterns. > Some are simple statements others are very complex scales and > questionnaires in between. > They are all variations on a theme. > Any answer can expressed in the in-line local form and/or with a reference > to an external source. > > > Gerard Freriks > +31 620347088 <+31%206%2020347088> > gf...@luna.nl > > Kattensingel 20 > 2801 CA Gouda > the Netherlands > > On 5 Jun 2017, at 07:59, Grahame Grieve <grahame@healthintersections. > com.au> wrote: > > hi Heather > > > A generic question/answer pattern is next to useless - interoperability > is really not helped > > I think you should rather say "A generic question/answer pattern is only > useful for exchanging the questions and answers, and does not allow re-use > of data". This is not 'next to useless for interoperability', just not fit > for any wider purpose > > Grahame > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
