Recently we discussed terminology bindings. We probably still have not got them right, but we don't have a model of what we think they should be. I posted a quick idea of a possible more structured version:

|term_bindings = < ["snomed_ct"] = < ["/data[id3]/events[id4]/data[id2]/items[id26]"] = (SIMPLE_BINDING) < target = <http://snomedct.info/id/169895004> -- Apgar score at 1 minute notes = <"some notes"> min_version = <"2017-02-01"> etc = <"etc"> > ["id26"]|||= (CONSTRAINT_BINDING) <| |||target |= <||"71388002|Procedure|:405815000|Procedure device| = 122456005|Laser device|, 260686004|Method| = 129304002|Excision - action|,405813007|Procedure site - direct| = 1549700l6|Ovarian structure|">||||||||min_version = <"2017-04-01">| notes = <"some notes"> etc = <"etc"> |> > >|


I noted that the right hand side of a binding can be a few different things, each of which would be accompanied by various meta-data, including:

 * a single concept code
 * a single code or other id referring to an external value set in an
   external terminology (in SNOMED it is a SNOMED code; for e.g. ICD10,
   there is no standard that I know of)
 * a composition expression that refers to a more refined concept
 * possible a constraint expression that locally determines a value set
   intensionally, to be resolved by application to the Terminology service.

I'd rather avoid the last, because of the brittleness of intensional ref-set query syntax expressions. In any case, we need a better idea of what meta-data are needed. E.g.:

 * something to do with (min) version of terminology required for the
   reference to be valid
 * something to do with purpose?
 * other notes - a tagged list of basic types?

I would like to get a better idea of the requirements.

- thomas


--
Thomas Beale
Principal, Ars Semantica <http://www.arssemantica.com>
Consultant, ABD Team, Intermountain Healthcare <https://intermountainhealthcare.org/> Management Board, Specifications Program Lead, openEHR Foundation <http://www.openehr.org> Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer Society <http://www.bcs.org/category/6044> Health IT blog <http://wolandscat.net/> | Culture blog <http://wolandsothercat.net/>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to