I agree that the technical solutions can be developed. More complicated is identifying the external services that will provide the authoritative, evidence-based, maintained knowledgebase for the systems to call, including all the variations based on age, gender, race, co-morbidities etc. If we think establishing, verifying and maintaining terminologies are difficult...
Regards Heather -----Original Message----- From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Friday, 2 March 2018 1:33 AM To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org Subject: Re: Setting thresholds On 01/03/2018 11:05, Seref Arikan wrote: > Hi Diego, > > I'd like to hear how you'd address the requirement via a call to an > external service. > I don't think it should be that complicated - after all, a call out to a terminology service is already a call out to a service; terminology is just one kind of reference knowledge that a query language / engine needs to get at; we can assume that a units service (as Bert and others were discussing earlier), lab results reference ranges, drug DB and so on may all be needed by the query service. So I think it mainly comes down to the syntax and programming model of talking out to such interfaces. We might potentially assume that they are all based on a common ontology meta-model of some kind (e.g. based on BFO, RO, IAO etc) in which case a common underlying style could be established. - thomas _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
