REF https://openehr.atlassian.net/browse/SPECPR-96
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Bert Verhees <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23-07-18 13:45, Diego Boscá wrote: > >> Units need to be (and will be) revamped, we also need other things >> already discussed in other posts like rubric, long descriptions (which >> could be language dependent), etc. This could be very useful for better >> describing custom UCUM units too. >> Several alternatives are being explored in order to not break current >> units definitions. Maybe adding an optional codephrase or terminology >> mapping could do the trick, as then you can tell where the unit comes from >> and allows you to provide a "code" which could either contain a Snomed code >> or a UCUM expression. Inputs are appreciated as always :) >> > > I think your suggested solution is just right ;-) > But possible I do not oversee all consequences > > Bert > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_ > lists.openehr.org > -- *Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez* [email protected] +598 99 043 145 skype: cabolabs Subscribe to our newsletter <http://eepurl.com/b_w_tj> <https://cabolabs.com/> http://www.cabolabs.com https://cloudehrserver.com
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
