Hi Jeff, That might be the current impl. But this whold thread was to discuss what the session id should be.
I'm trying to say that of the 4 options presented at the root of this thread I'd prefer that the session ID be tied to the particular client which would lead to the smallest glob of stuff that gets locked. if we go with the first option (again from the root of the thread) we would have a session id per client vm, that is what I don't want. -bd- On Wednesday, July 12, 2006, at 11:36AM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Bill Dudney wrote: >> >> If the seesion id is tied to the client vm, i.e. the web vm then there is >> one session id per web tier vm (which in all likelyhood has many many users). >> > >Hmmm...I don't think I agree here. I believe the session id is tied to >the client...period. There is one id per session per client...not web >tier vm. Maybe you can explain what you are thinking? > >Its my understanding the session id is like a web session...that >particular client gets a unique id that represents only that session for >that client. > >Jeff > >
