On Aug 29, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Matthew Jording wrote:

Thats what I'm figuring out. I'm currently testing my ejb3 beans against the current openejb3 snapshot in the standalone and tomcat integration. I will continue to plug away at the GBeans, I have a build that compiles but the car integration doesn't work, claims the gbeans have an invalid constructors. So if I do make any advances I can send them out as a patch to openejb3, would Dain be the person to send that out to? Not sure if its a Geronimo or OpenEJB contribution.

If you come up with something, best approach would be to put it into OpenEJB JIRA and then send a note the dev list to make sure it's on people's radar.

-David

Matt


David Blevins wrote:

On Aug 28, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Matthew Jording wrote:

I am doing a quick test to see if I can cram openejb3 into geronimo 1.2 snapshot. As a first test I am porting the GBeans and noticed that the org.openejb.mdb.DefaultMdbContainerGBean would be missing both the base container class and a namespace within openEjb3. Since I assume this is a move because of a new MDB strategy for EJB3? If this is for lack of JMS provider implementation how close are you to supporting activemq?

At this point it would take a lot to cram openejb3 into geronimo 1.2 snapshot.

Fundamentally we are still in the process of merging the openejb 2 and openejb 1 codebases here in openejb 3. Dain Sundstrom has done a few weeks of work openejb 2 (used in geronimo 1.2) and aligning it with openejb 3, but there is still a few more weeks to go.

The basic areas to tackle are:

 1. alignment of the containers
 2. alignment of deployment

We've been doing heavy work on the containers for EJB 3 compliance so aligning the 2 containers to the 3 containers (and vice versa) is a moving target. We try and sync when the opportunities arise. There was a big architecture change in openejb 2 for this purpose (i.e. partial alignment with openejb 3), but I think we've seen all we are going to see in the Geronimo 1.2 time frame.

However... if you skipped the GBean route all together and used the OpenEJB/Tomcat integration to cram OpenEJB 3 into Geronimo/ Tomcat, that may work though it would certainly not offer the same transaction and security integration you get in the OpenEJB 2 and Geronimo integration.

-David


Thanks
Matthew Jording





Reply via email to