On 9/28/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd be happy with anything other than 'openejb' for a root pom artifactId. Simply because if we use it, we no longer have the option to create some sort of user-land deliverable with that name. Maybe an openejb-N.N.jar and openejb-N.N.pom or something along those lines. What do you think?
I don't really know. It seemed very compeling to named it openejb. XBean, OpenJPA did this too. Even Geronimo has its parent as geronimo. I'm not a strong proponent of using openejb, but it looked the best available choice. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.laskowski.net.pl
