On Oct 2, 2006, at 1:24 PM, David Blevins wrote:
<jndi-name interface="some.bean.SomeBeanLocalHomeInterface">some/ jndi/name/SomeBeanLocalHome</jndi-name> <jndi-name interface="some.bean.SomeBeanRemoteHomeInterface">some/ jndi/name/SomeBeanRemoteHome</jndi-name> <jndi-name interface="some.bean.SomeBeanRemoteBusinessInterface">some/jndi/ name/SomeBeanRemoteBizIntfc</jndi-name> <jndi-name interface="some.bean.SomeBeanLocalBusinessInterface">some/jndi/name/ SomeBeanLocalBizIntfc</jndi-name>
I never responded to this directly, but I think it is the right direction to take OpenEJB 3. The only change I'd make it to maybe rename the tag from jndi-name to binding. My earlier proposal neatly fits into this model since the name is just a string, so if you have rmi-naming bound to rmi: you can still bind directly to rmi:myBean.
-dain
