On Nov 2, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 11/2/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right, you and I are talking about the same thing. Any thoughts on
how to avoid future headaces when code using the generated code
doesn't compile as we go to another 2.0.x version.
Don't we just weigh the benefits of the new version against the cost
of updating code that the new version broke? It sounds like either
way there's the potential for breakage as new versions come along.
Right. It's more a discussion of where we are ok with the breakage
occurring.
-David
