Hi David and Mohammad,
                   I will be happy to take this up and collaborate
with Mohammad and anyone else interested. I will take up the public
field injection tests first

 [OPENEJB-161] iTest: StatelessBeanPublicFieldInjectionTests
 [OPENEJB-187] iTest: StatefulBeanPublicFieldInjectionTests
Will start combing through the spec :-) for related info

Thanks
Manu


On 11/16/06, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David...

The mail is not directed to me :), but I really want to join into these
tests specially the ones which their container code is not implemented yet
so I can write the test case and go through its related container code too
:), so I would like to have these ones:

 [OPENEJB-160] iTest: StatelessBeanSetterInjectionTests
 [OPENEJB-186] iTest: StatefulBeanSetterInjectionTests

On 11/15/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Nov 9, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Manu George wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> >               That explains it. The Pojo name in some of the test
> > cases. I was wondering what it was. I have attached the patches for
> > 152 and 156.
>
> Ok, I've got 152 and 156 applied and checked in.  Thank you very much
> for those!
>
> > Please assign some others to me namely 154 and 155.
>
> I see you already have these completed and patches in for those --
> you work fast.  I'll get those in for you today too.
>
> Thanks Manu!  You're really cruising these tests.  Any interest in
> working on one of these?
>
>     [OPENEJB-160] iTest: StatelessBeanSetterInjectionTests
>     [OPENEJB-161] iTest: StatelessBeanPublicFieldInjectionTests
>     [OPENEJB-162] iTest: StatelessBeanCallbackTests
>     [OPENEJB-186] iTest: StatefulBeanSetterInjectionTests
>     [OPENEJB-187] iTest: StatefulBeanPublicFieldInjectionTests
>     [OPENEJB-188] iTest: StatefulBeanCallbackTests
>
> Not as easy as the other ones as there's no pre-existing test to copy/
> paste from.  But I get the feeling you may be up to the challenge.
> The corresponding setter injection code in the container has not been
> written, so these tests will not pass but they will be a very big
> help in completing that functionality.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
>
>


--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour


Reply via email to