I think we can use the approach specified in the specs of EJB3.0 "Core Contracts and Requirements", that we use the fully qualified name of the EJB followed by the name of the interface(s) it supports. For example if we have an EJB com.oejb3.examples.ExampleBean, and this EJB supports two biz interfaces, so we can have two JNDI names as follows for each biz interface, *java:comp/env/com.oejb3.examples.ExampleBean/BizIntfcOne* and *java:comp/env/com.oejb3.examples.ExampleBean/BizIntfcTwo*. Thoughts ???
Hi Mohammad, where did you find this fact mentioned in the specification? -- Filippo
