Hi ,
How do I startup the activemq version distributed with openejb?
If I want to run an example MDB then I need to get activemq running
along with openejb. It doesn't seem to get started by default. Or do i
need to startup an independent instance of amq?
Thanks
Manu
On 12/14/06, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dain,
Thanks for the explanation. I think what you suggested is
the best bet i.e. better integration. I can try to test the AMQ
integration by writing some MDB iTests.
Thanks
Manu
On 12/14/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:01 AM, Manu George wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Are there plans to provide poolsize configuration for all types
> > of containers. I am seeing support for stateless and stateful and for
> > MDB container there is InstanceLimit which I assume is the same. Won't
> > it be better to change this also to pool size for ease of
> > configuration for users?
>
> We can, but they aren't the same thing. In the MDB case we are
> limiting the number of instances the resource adapter (ActiveMQ) is
> allowed to acquire from the container. The actual pool size and
> pooling configurations are completely controlled by the resource
> adapter.
>
> Then again, they setting should have the same effect as poolSize +
> strict in the other containers.
>
> What do you think we should do?
>
>
> > Are there anything similar for CMP and BMP containers?
>
> For cmp, pooling and caching is completely controlled by the JPA
> implementation. I don't know about BMP.
>
> One thing we should be able to do in the long run is provide stronger
> integration with ActiveMQ and OpenJPA, where common settings like
> PoolSize can be passed on into them, but to start with we need to get
> our current ActiveMQ tested and the CMP container finished. Does
> anyone want to try testing the ActiveMQ integration?
>
> -dain
>
