On Feb 3, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Feb 3, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 2/4/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was thinking it would be nice if client code could call use the
OpenEJB injection facilities. Say you have some unit tests. You
could in the setUp method, lookup a bunch of stuff in JNDI and write
it into fields, but it would be much nicer to simple annotate your
fields and have OpenEJB inject directly. I'm thinking of something
like this:
public class SomeTest extends TestCase {
@Resource
private SomeEjb someEjb;
public void setUp() {
OpenEJB.inject(this);
}
}
I can think of a bunch of ways we could implement this, but what do
you think of the idea generally?
Yeah, that would be of help.
There's one caveat with it. When I first read the email of yours I
couldn't see the point because of the name which would perform the
injection. That's what the method would do, wouldn't it? So why it
isn't called performInjection or doInjection or alike? Other than
that
the idea's excellent.
I don't really care what it is called. I just found the phrase
"inject this" funny in english.
Check out this thread. http://www.nabble.com/%40EJB-injection-for-
TestCases-%28would-be-cool%29-tf2889639s2756.html#a8072860
One of the ideas we came up with there was people could pass a
reference to their TestCase instance along with the other
InitialContext params.
-David
