I didn't realize that I am responding to openejb-dev list :o( . Ignore my post on adding geronimo to the filename.
Thanks, Vamsi On 2/8/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 7, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: > Should we add geronimo to the filename and call it > geronimo-system.properties? The system property override feature has been around since OpenEJB 1.x (e.g. it's not a geronimo thing). Ted Kirby posted a proposal and patch recently for similar functionality in Geronimo. Check out: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/? t=116916235600001&r=1&w=2 -David > > Vamsi > > On 2/8/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Ok, throwing out another idea. We've got a number of things that can >> be configured via system properties. What do people think about >> having a file called system.properties we put in the conf/ directory >> where people can put any properties they want and we will read them >> in and add them to System.getProperties(). >> >> This would be in addition to the ability people already have to >> properties added to the system properties via -D args. E.g. >> >> ./bin/openejb start -Dfoo=bar >> >> We'd probably want the -D args to be applied after we read in the >> system.properties file so anything on the command line would win. >> >> We have a ton of things we can do with system properties already. I >> started to write them into this email but moved it into a new >> confluence page as it was too big :) >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/OPENEJB/system-properties.html >> >> See this related jira (OPENEJB-451) >> >> Not to mention people may want to add their own properties for their >> apps. See a related idea (OPENEJB-457) >> >> So what do people think? Thumbs up? Thumbs down? <Insert your >> thoughts here> >> >> -David >> >> >> >>
