Raj, That makes sense to me but I did have a method to my madness. The idea was that OpenEJB plugins will be single entities for simplicity. The WTP support would be in one plugin while the other features, not yet decided upon of course, would be in their own plugin structures. This is an initial "offering" to get us started. I do not have a problem refactoring to make it more Eclipse-like. Let's see what everyone else thinks. Besides, right now there is only one reference to a non-jst extension point and it would be crazy to create an extra plugin just for the server icon.
Take care, Jeremy On 2/13/07, Raj Saini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jeremy, I was looking at the existing server plugins in Eclipse WTP. Should we not have the similar structure as existing plugins? Also, existing plugins in eclipse are under JST. Should we follow the same convention for naming OpenEJB eclipse plugin? Thanks, Raj
