Awesome !
The interceptor chaining order, the method-level interceptor and the
@ExcludeClass all work fine now.
Thanx for the quick turnaround David.
Cheers
Prasad
On 3/16/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:27 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
>> Thanx.
>>
>> On that count, then we are having a problem with this kinda
>> interception too.
>>
>> The interception from a superclass (both bean's and interceptor's) is
>> not being invoked.
>>
>> Let me post the patch soon. Continue to use the same JIRA ?
>
> Right, as I mentioned we don't support that yet. Well, we didn't.
> I went and fixed it after you posted. Just checked it in.
>
> It turns out we do have an issue of some sort with exclusions.
> Fixing that now.
>
> Who needs a TCK when we've got you! :) Great work!
Alright, the exclude issue is fixed!
It should work. Give the test another go!
-David
>
>
> -David
>
>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Prasad
>>
>> On 3/16/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 16, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>>>
>>> > May I please draw your attention to section 12.3.1 of the ejb-core
>>> > spec. The section is titled, "Multiple Business Method Interceptor
>>> > Methods"
>>> >
>>> > After reading bullets 2 and 4, I can conclude that an
>>> interceptor's
>>> > superclass @AroundInvoke method is first invoked after which the
>>> > interceptor's @AroundInvoke method is invoked. Am I right ?
>>> >
>>> > Next, it is also my understanding that you do not have to
>>> explicitly
>>> > list the interceptor's superclass in the @Interceptors({})
>>> annotation.
>>> > If the child interceptor is listed, then any superclass
>>> interceptor is
>>> > automatically invoked. Is that a correct understanding ?
>>>
>>> Right on both counts. An exception is when the child class
>>> overrides
>>> the super class's AroundInvoke method (same with PostCreate,
>>> PreDestroy, PrePassivate and PrePassivate), in which case the super
>>> class's method is then "disabled" and now not invoked as part of the
>>> chain. We don't actually support that yet, but we need to.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>
>
