These mails are great. Cleared a lot of my doubts on interceptors. Keep up the great work
Regards Manu On 3/28/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 27, 2007, at 8:42 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > >> On 3/27/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> However, in our example and testcase (as described in the >> beginning of >> this thread), it's a case of total ordering at the class level vs. >> @exclude at the method level. The @exclude at the method level is >> ignored - which is incorrect. Agreed ? > > Agreed. I haven't had time to look into the test case. Alright, I found the problem and fixed it. Simply and to move the exclusion check up to the top of the loop. Should be spot on now -- until you find the next bug that is :) Update, build and give it another try. -David
