Hi Matt... Thanks for you and Jacek, I will talk about myself, I was OK with the proposed PMC list and I am still OK with it. And for the subject that whether that list is for committers of PMC members I think this was clear - at least for me - from the first time Jacek raised this issue in another mail. I think we need now another voting thread to vote for the current PMC list.
On 4/4/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > > There was one missing point I had not noticed then. I was mistaken > that the PMC is exactly the same thing as the committers group. I > thought that since they were just voted in it wouldn't have been fair > to exclude them from the list. I messed it up completely. I had > corrected myself right after I sent the email about adding them to the > group of the proposed initial PMC. So, my question about adding > Mohammad and Manu doesn't apply here. Ok, thanks for the clarification. Based on all the discussion it seems reasonable to reset, ask people if they are cool with the proposed PMC (as it appears that some would like to see a different composition) and get the community consensus. My guess is that this all boils down to some assumptions in communication and people assuming things are not kosher. For my 2c I'm fine with the proposed PMC I'm just concerned about the broken thread of communication and seeming confusion on people's parts of who's in / who's out, etc. I think the proposed list confused people (as you indicated above) that it was the group of committers.
-- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
