With a few additional changes
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-564) the Geronimo test
case I have appears to be working now. Thanks everybody for help! I
will try to work on the JAX-WS test case now (and I'm sure I will need
help with that too :)).

Thanks again,
Jarek

On 4/18/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,

 I was thinking of where to put that code. Thanks for the advice David
will do that.

Regards
Manu

On 4/18/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Manu George wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >      I just attached a patch to
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-563. Its something i put
> > together fast. It works (Test Case runs fine). David can you give it a
> > look and point out any issues.
>
> Looks great, Manu!
>
> Couple thoughts I had.  We should be able to set the MessageContext
> in the ThreadContext in container's "if (isWebService...)" block
> which would eliminate the large chunk that seems to do it in the
> ReflectionInvocationContext.  As far as the parameters go I totally
> forgot to add an assertEquals to verify the bean gets "Hello World"
> as the arg and is able to return it.  We should definitely add that.
>
> Feel free to check it in as is then update or update it then check it
> in, whatever you like.  It's good to go!
>
> Jarek, thanks for patch OPENEJB-562!  Applying it now.  Any chance
> you'll be able to do the JAX-WS version of the JAX-RPC test case?
> Manu and/or some else might be able to help get that running too.
> Let us know what your thoughts are.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
> > Regards
> > Manu
> >
> > On 4/17/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 4/16/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > I would like to volunteer for this task :). Anyone else
> >> interested to join me ?
> >>
> >> I'll surely be watching your steps, but can't commit any time on it
> >> yet. I'd like to throw some fresh air to the assembly module.
> >>
> >> Jacek
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jacek Laskowski
> >> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
> >>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to