On Thu, 2026-02-05 at 11:57 -0500, Philip Balister via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > I am going to make the suggestion: > > Let's try what Daniel suggests. > > Far to often we get bogged down in conversations about what the correct > thing is to do, and lose track of the fact we need to do something and > see what works. The list he suggests only has a handful of posts and if > it doesn't get any traction, I will suggest we remove it. Until, lets > see of people working in this eco system can use it to coordinate work. > > If we can get people coordinating over email, then we need a larger > conversation about getting people to work together.
Your call but I'm not particularly happy about this. This basically says that when people feel like it they can bypass/ignore bodies like the TSC and there isn't really going to be any responsibility/fallback/oversight. I would *love* to be able to do many things more freely yet I am permanently tied up in so much red tape I feel like I'm drowning and can't get anything done. The security-discussions list has sat for a number of months with a single post. It seems the idea didn't work out and yet the list is still there and it causes confusions with other "security" lists. Is something going to be done about that or are we still hoping it might work out? Is someone going to drive that? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#2244): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2244 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117655357/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
