On 05/12/2011 07:49 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
There is: http://www.yoctoproject.org/community/mailing-lists
Which needs to be updated to better reflect the oe-core aspect I think.
This might be at least one source of the cross posting as people are not
sure poky vs oe-core.
It seems to me there is a whole bunch of discussion happening on the
poky list about making changes that that would effect everyone using
openembedded-core. Do we have two lists for discussion of stuff that
effect the oe-core?
No. As I understand it, things that go into poky.git/meta and things
that go into oe-core should be sent to the openembedded-core list. Patch
series for poky.git should be isolated in such a way so that they do not
include changes to meta (oe-core) and other areas at the same time.
>
> Does anyone have a different view?
>
This seems logical to me. Thanks. I also think discussion of a
potential patch should be done on the list that the patch would go to yes?
Maybe we could drive that definition to ground and get the mailing list
page updated.
---
So above, perhaps my "whole bunch" was overstated. Let me retract that
and say at least some.
I don't mean to pick on you Darren; I really am just trying to
understand and an example is often helpful. Earlier you and Richard
were discussing directdisc images [1] with a suggestion that it might be
ripe for removal. Should that have been on oe-core?
[1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/2011-May/006106.htm
Thanks,
Bill
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
