On (11/05/11 13:45), Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 11 mei 2011, om 12:54 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:45 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> >>> For the uclibc bits, I'm proposing
> >>> to add:
> >>>
> >>> +DEPLOY_DIR_append = "-uclibc"
> >>> +STAGING_DIR_TARGET_append = "-uclibc"
> >>> +STAGING_DIR_HOST_append = "-uclibc"
> >>> +SSTATE_MANIFESTS_append = "-uclibc"
> >>>
> >>> to tclibc-uclibc.inc.
> >>
> >> Can we use _append_libc-uclibc = "uclibc" or even plain ${TCLIBC} in a
> >> generic include file? That would be a lot more readable and fix glibc
> >> vs eglibc.
> >
> > Changing uclibc around is ok as its not something that has worked well
> > in with OE-Core for a while. What I'm trying to avoid is having to bump
> > all the versions of the sstate files, the sysroot layout and associated
> > version numbers which is what would have to happen if we change the
> > eglibc layout :(.
> >
> > Obviously, if angstrom switches layout its pain for you though so I
> > suspect someone loses with this either way :/.
>
> I would think consistency is best, so either set always append TCLIBC or
> never. This isn't a lot more pain than the '-' to '_' change in machine names
> a while ago. And that even had runtime pains!
>
I would agree we should always append TCLIBC
> regards,
>
> Koen
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
-Khem
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
