On 5/27/2011 12:41 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 5/27/11 2:36 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Mark Hatle<mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote:
On 5/27/11 1:25 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15 AM,<nitin.a.kam...@intel.com> wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble<nitin.a.kam...@intel.com>
This fixes an internal compiler error for gcc 4.6.0 for armv7
Patch came from: Phil Blundell<p...@pbcl.net>
Validated by Nitin
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble<nitin.a.kam...@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: Phil Blundell<p...@pbcl.net>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc | 3 +-
.../gcc/gcc-4.6.0/ICE_fix_for_arm.patch | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/ICE_fix_for_arm.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc
index fb5c70d..4407eca 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0.inc
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ require gcc-common.inc
require gcc-4_6-branch-backports.inc
-PR = "r2"
+PR = "r3"
DEPENDS =+ "mpfr gmp libmpc"
NATIVEDEPS = "mpfr-native gmp-native gettext-native libmpc-native"
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/gcc/gcc-${PV}/gcc-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
file://gcc-poison-parameters.patch \
file://GPLUSPLUS_INCLUDE_DIR_with_sysroot.patch \
file://COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS.patch \
+ file://ICE_fix_for_arm.patch \
"
SRC_URI_append_sh3 = " file://sh3-installfix-fixheaders.patch;patch=1 "
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/ICE_fix_for_arm.patch
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/ICE_fix_for_arm.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..037a180
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/ICE_fix_for_arm.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Patch came from: Phil Blundell<p...@pbcl.net>
+Validated by Nitin
+This fixes the following internal compiler error of gcc 4.6.0 on for armv7-a
+related gcc bugzilla: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719
+
+
+| arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon
+-mfloat-abi=softfp -fno-tree-vectorize
+--sysroot=/srv/home/pokybuild/poky-slave/nightly-external/build/build/tmp/sysroots/beagleboard
+-c -I. -I../../../../src/gallium/include -I../../../../src/gallium/auxiliary
+-I../../../../src/gallium/drivers
+-I../../../../src/gallium/drivers/svga/include -O2 -pipe -g
+-feliminate-unused-debug-types -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -std=c99 -ffast-math
+-fvisibility=hidden -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPTHREADS
+-DHAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN -DUSE_XSHM -std=gnu99 -fvisibility=hidden -DHAVE_STDINT_H
+-DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H svga_resource_buffer_upload.c -o
+svga_resource_buffer_upload.o
+| svga_tgsi_insn.c: In function 'svga_shader_emit_instructions':
+| svga_tgsi_insn.c:2969:1: internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at
+config/arm/arm.c:12084
+| Please submit a full bug report,
+| with preprocessed source if appropriate.
+| See<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
+| make[4]: *** [svga_tgsi_insn.o] Error 1
+
+Nitin A Kamble<nitin.a.kam...@intel.com> 2011/05/27
+
+Index: gcc-4.6.0/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
+===================================================================
+--- gcc-4.6.0.orig/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
++++ gcc-4.6.0/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
+@@ -4213,7 +4213,9 @@
+ uxth%?\\t%0, %1
+ ldr%(h%)\\t%0, %1"
+ [(set_attr "type" "alu_shift,load_byte")
+- (set_attr "predicable" "yes")]
++ (set_attr "predicable" "yes")
++ (set_attr "pool_range" "*,256")
++ (set_attr "neg_pool_range" "*,244")]
+ )
+
FWIW a patch which is similar to this was rejected here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01731.html
based on that link, I'd say there are two cases that are needed for a proper
workaround.
Then likely we wait until upstream has a fix....
working around package is better than working around gcc IMHO
Problem is the ICE will still be there. If we put the workaround in gcc, then
the package will work with different versions of gcc (without modification), and
other packages will not experience this ICE.
(This of course is assuming the gcc workaround is reasonable and not introducing
other faults.)
we should qualify and run regression tests IMO to validate it if we
intend patch gcc. I think fixing the given recipe is path of least impact
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
