On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:21 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> > --- > meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 7 ++++++- > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf > index de94316..4722eb0 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf > +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf > @@ -248,13 +248,18 @@ FILES_${PN}-doc = "${docdir} ${mandir} ${infodir} > ${datadir}/gtk-doc \ > SECTION_${PN}-doc = "doc" > > FILES_${PN}-dev = "${includedir} ${libdir}/lib*${SOLIBSDEV} ${libdir}/*.la \ > - ${libdir}/*.a ${libdir}/*.o ${libdir}/pkgconfig \ > + ${libdir}/*.o ${libdir}/pkgconfig \ > ${datadir}/pkgconfig ${datadir}/aclocal \ > ${base_libdir}/*.a ${base_libdir}/*.o" > SECTION_${PN}-dev = "devel" > ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-dev = "1" > RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = "${PN} (= ${EXTENDPKGV})" > > +FILES_${PN}-static-dev = "${libdir}/*.a ${base_libdir}/*.a" > +SECTION_${PN}-static-dev = "devel" > +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-static-dev = "1"
No need for the ALLOW_EMPTY here. The dependencies of -dev packages are important but it makes no sense for static dv packages. I've also a slight preference for "staticdev" just to make these clearly different from -dev packages. Cheers, Richard > +RDEPENDS_${PN}-static-dev = "${PN} (= ${EXTENDPV})" > + > DOTDEBUG-dbg = "${bindir}/.debug ${sbindir}/.debug ${libexecdir}/.debug > ${libdir}/.debug \ > ${base_bindir}/.debug ${base_sbindir}/.debug > ${base_libdir}/.debug ${libdir}/${PN}/.debug \ > ${libdir}/matchbox-panel/.debug /usr/src/debug" _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core