On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > I'm not sure if the libraries that RPM uses would even be able to link w/o > openssl. (I never tried it.) But that will affect people who are using RPM > packages as signing and validation routines come from openssl.
Sure, but if rpmdeps doesn't need those bits then we could have two recipes: a heavy one for those people who want rpm packages, and a lighter one for those who need rpmdeps to make package.bbclass work but don't otherwise have any requirement for rpm. p. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
