On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 10:36 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> Ping? > > I'm not against this move at all but before this patch merges we should > really have a cleanup which removes the *.machine configuration files > from the uclibc recipe directory along with all the machine specific > overrides that are in use instead making them arch specific. > > Any volunteers? >
Yes thats in my todo list. > Cheers, > > Richard > > >> p. >> >> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:55 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: >> > There is no good reason for uclibc to be machine specific. Remove local >> > assignment to PACKAGE_ARCH so that it gets the default target >> > architecture and bump PR for that change. >> > >> > See >> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-May/003064.html >> > >> > Also replace a chunk of anonymous python with a COMPATIBLE_HOST >> > declaration. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
