PACKAGE_ARCH is set to BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH so we do not need to define it here since we already define BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH
angstrom sets FEED_ARCH like FEED_ARCH ?= "${BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH}" and 'all' doesnt go well for FEED_ARCH as it ends up with parsing error for x86 machines. This might be a latent bug in bitbake but allarch.bbclass excavated it and we burry it in the same class. This makes the behavior same as it was before allarch.bbclass where we set PACKAGE_ARCH = all for common packages Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> --- meta/classes/allarch.bbclass | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass b/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass index e3ac392..b9ba28b 100644 --- a/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/allarch.bbclass @@ -2,9 +2,10 @@ # This class is used for architecture independent recipes/data files (usally scripts) # +# We need to pour the value of BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH into FEED_ARCH +# before we reset it +FEED_ARCH := ${BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH} BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH = "all" -PACKAGE_ARCH = "all" - # No need for virtual/libc or a cross compiler INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1" -- 1.7.4.1 _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core