On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>
> Op 22 jun 2011, om 18:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> changes since V1
>>>
>>> Separate out non gcc changes to a different pull request
>>> Patches are not attached inline due to sheer size of them
>>> as they might choke patchwork. The are only on the branch
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit 78de64f58b98101f5be5778e9ecbdaae5ba32997:
>>>
>>>  binutils_2.21.bb: Fix ld segfault exposed by eglibc 2.14 on x86_64 
>>> (2011-06-21 17:58:06 -0700)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>  git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib kraj/gcc-4.6
>>>  http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/gcc-4.6
>>>
>>> Khem Raj (2):
>>>  gcc-4.6: Switch to using svn SRC_URI for recipe
>>>  tcmode-default.inc: use 4.6 for GCCVERSION and SDKGCCVERSION
>>
>> I'm afraid I don't like having "gcc 4.6" being so publicly visible. Its
>> fine for the recipe names but the PV itself really needs to be something
>> like "4.6.2+svn".
>>
>> I say this as a person who'd have to deal with people claiming we're
>> behind on gcc since we were on 4.6[.0] :/
>
> There will always be people claiming nonsense about numbers :)

Hi Richard

I have pushed updated patches to the branch now. PV is set to 4.6.0+svnr${SRCPV}
and we use wild card in choosing gcc version

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to