> -----Original Message----- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Khem Raj > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 7:43 AM > To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libc-locale: split locale handling from > libc > recipe. > > On 06/23/2011 03:14 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:40 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 12:08 +0800, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > >>>> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On > Behalf > >>>> Of Phil Blundell > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:45 PM > >>>> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > >>>> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libc-locale: split locale > >>>> handling from libc recipe. > >>>> > >>>> I still don't quite understand why the virtual/libiconv provider > >>>> has moved from eglibc to eglibc-locale. Can you explain what's going on > there? > >>> > >>> Generally, the purpose of this patch is to reduce eglibc's do_package > >>> time. > >>> > >>> Since many other recipes' do_package have dependency on eglibc's > do_package, thus the sooner eglibc could finish its do_package, the ealier can > other do_packages be executed, which improves the parallelism. > >>> > >>> From our study, we found most of eglibc's do_package time is used to > handle locale. Therefore we split all the locale related stuffs into a > separately > recipe eglibc-locale. > >> > >> Yes, I understand that. But I don't think this answers the question > >> about why, specifically, glibc-locale is now PROVIDEing > >> virtual/libiconv. Does that recipe, in fact, implement libiconv? > > > > I must admit I was wondering about this too. Isn't the libiconv > > functionality still packaged as part of the libc recipe, not the > > locale part? > > > yes it should be in libc
Oh, it should be a mistake. I have changed that in my patch and doing test for it now. Thanks, Dongxiao > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-core mailing list > > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core