Khem Raj wrote:
> On 06/28/2011 04:07 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 07:45:09 Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> So it works as expected, but the output is a bit confusing. I have
>>> a few (conflicting) suggestions: 
>>> 
>>> 1) replace _BRANCH and _REVISION with ' branch' and ' revision',
>>> e.g.: 
>>> 
>>>     meta-archos branch          = "master"
>>>     meta-archos revision        =
>>> "413933fb5f62574e38a9a1e38905ba6e9c1be4ad" 
>>> 
>>> 2) for the extra layers put branch and revision on a single line:
>>> 
>>>     meta-archos          =
>>> "master/413933fb5f62574e38a9a1e38905ba6e9c1be4ad" 
>> 
>> I'd go with option 2 over 1, personally - the list gets rather long
>> on something like Angstrom, better to keep it short.
> 
> I would say to do it uniformly and treat oe-core as one of layers too
> when emitting this info
Ok. I'll make a new version for this.
BTW: meta and mete-yocto belong to the same git repo actually, so do you think 
showing them in one line like this

meta,meta-yocto   = "master:2c2d9d7c0e942b6748bc8bd7d5980113bae9a836"

is better than showing 2 lines like this:

meta             = "master:2c2d9d7c0e942b6748bc8bd7d5980113bae9a836"
meta-yocto    = "master:2c2d9d7c0e942b6748bc8bd7d5980113bae9a836"

?

Thanks,
-- Dexuan
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to