From: Ilya Yanok <ya...@emcraft.com>
Acoording to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44392
correct fix should be
TARGET_EITHER && (arm_arch6 || !optimize_size)
not
TARGET_EITHER && (arm_arch6 && !optimize_size)
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <ya...@emcraft.com>
---
.../gcc/gcc-4.5.1/arm-bswapsi2.patch | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.5.1/arm-bswapsi2.patch
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.5.1/arm-bswapsi2.patch
index 9b9f874..a7a6684 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.5.1/arm-bswapsi2.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.5.1/arm-bswapsi2.patch
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Index: gcc-4.5/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
(bswap:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "r")))]
-"TARGET_EITHER"
-+"TARGET_EITHER && (arm_arch6 && !optimize_size)"
++"TARGET_EITHER && (arm_arch6 || !optimize_size)"
"
if (!arm_arch6)
{
--
1.7.3.4
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
