On Tuesday 02 August 2011 15:27:58 Chris Larson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Paul Eggleton > > <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 August 2011 15:14:41 Chris Larson wrote: > >> as config/class priority is > >> determined by order of entries in BBLAYERS, whereas recipe priority is > >> determined by layer.conf. > > > > Is that a good thing though? At the moment I'm not convinced that it is. > > I probably could have worded my reply better. I was pointing out the > fact that the order is determined in two places right now as being one > reason why I agreed with his statement that ordering determined by the > layer isn't ideal.
Well, all the same I'd like to have that question answered, maybe that's a different thread. Back to Phil's original point though, I tend to think issues with meta-oe ought to be solved by fixing meta-oe - if some things in meta-oe are causing so much trouble that we have to down-grade the priority of the layer in order to squelch them, that's bad. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core