On Aug 2, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On 08/02/2011 08:19 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 03:14 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> +-_am_tools='gnutar m4_if([$1], [ustar], [plaintar]) pax cpio none' >>> ++_am_tools='gnutar m4_if([$1], [ustar], [plaintar]) cpio pax none' >> >> Have you discussed that with upstream? If not, are you confident that >> preferring cpio will not simply mean that we are swapping one deficiency >> for another? > > A bug was filed with upstream automake. At issue is that pax does not > fail gracefully when it cannot create ustar archives while cpio does. > >>> +Index: automake-1.11.1/Makefile.in >>> +=================================================================== >>> +--- automake-1.11.1.orig/Makefile.in >>> ++++ automake-1.11.1/Makefile.in >>> +@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ am__aclocal_m4_deps = $(top_srcdir)/m4/a >>> + $(top_srcdir)/m4/missing.m4 $(top_srcdir)/m4/mkdirp.m4 \ >>> + $(top_srcdir)/m4/options.m4 $(top_srcdir)/m4/runlog.m4 \ >>> + $(top_srcdir)/m4/sanity.m4 $(top_srcdir)/m4/strip.m4 \ >>> +- $(top_srcdir)/m4/substnot.m4 $(top_srcdir)/m4/tar.m4 \ >>> ++ $(top_srcdir)/m4/substnot.m4 \ >>> + $(top_srcdir)/configure.ac >>> + am__configure_deps = $(am__aclocal_m4_deps) $(CONFIGURE_DEPENDENCIES) \ >>> + $(ACLOCAL_M4) >> >> Can you explain why this hunk is necessary? > > That I don't recall. Possibly some sort of re-gen hell I was trying / > needing to avoid. > >> >>> +do_configure () { >>> + touch ${S}/Makefile.in >>> + autotools_do_configure >>> +} >> >> ... and this one? > > Didn't do that one. Kumar? :)
I think I pulled that from the SB3 change you made. - k _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core