I agree. I don't see reason for dropping parallelism completely. There is a real gain when running on beefier machines. Making it configurable would probably be best. Or just drop it to a saner value, like 20 or 10. - Markus
On 16/08/2017, 2.53, "Mark Hatle" <openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org on behalf of mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote: It would probably be better if this was configurable with a 'safe' default. Moving from parallel to single will greatly affect the overall performance on larger build machines (lots of memory and cores) that can handle the load vs a typical development machine. --Mark On 8/15/17 4:40 PM, leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com> > > gpg signing in file batches (which was default to 100) is a memory expensive > computation, causing trouble in some host machines (even on production AB > as seen on the bugzilla ID). Also, in terms of performance, there is no real > gain when rpm signing is done in batches. Considering the latter issues, perform the > rpm signing serially. > > Log showing errors observed recently at AB workers: > > | gpg: signing failed: Cannot allocate memory > | gpg: signing failed: Cannot allocate memory > | error: gpg exec failed (2) > | /home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-oe-selftest/build/build/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/base-passwd/3.5.29-r0/deploy-rpms/core2_64/base-passwd-dev-3.5.29-r0.core2_64.rpm: > > [YOCTO #11914] > > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com> > --- > meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py b/meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py > index f4d8b10e4b..5c7985a856 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py > @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ class LocalSigner(object): > if fsk_password: > cmd += "--define '_file_signing_key_password %s' " % fsk_password > > - # Sign in chunks of 100 packages > - for i in range(0, len(files), 100): > - status, output = oe.utils.getstatusoutput(cmd + ' '.join(files[i:i+100])) > + # Sign packages > + for f in files: > + status, output = oe.utils.getstatusoutput(cmd + ' ' + f) > if status: > raise bb.build.FuncFailed("Failed to sign RPM packages: %s" % output) > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core