On 26.08.2017 14:27, Jose Alarcon wrote: > > On 25.08.2017 15:29, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 09:43 +0300, Jose Alarcon wrote: >>> The do_rootfs log contains a number of unsatisfied package >>> recommendations. At the moment those are only visible when >>> reviewing the rootfs log. >>> >>> This class adds an extra check to surface any unsatisfied >>> recommendation as WARNINGS to the build output. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jose Alarcon <jose.alar...@ge.com> >>> --- >>> meta/classes/rootfs-check-recommends.bbclass | 21 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 meta/classes/rootfs-check-recommends.bbclass >> This looks like it would be a better fit for rootfs- >> postcommands.bbclass? > Thanks. I sent a new patch with this check done in rootfs-postcommands > class.
New patch with the check done in rootfs-postcommands here: https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/8521/# The reason why I implemented this as a class in the first place was that we don't want to modify upstream layers and there is no way to append a bbclass. So I created a new class in our own layer instead. But for upstreaming it is true that rootfs-postcommands is a better fit. Thanks, -- Jose -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
