On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doesn't this belong into: > [OE-core] [PATCH v8 03/13] go: split out go-runtime into separate recipe > where it packaging change was probably introduced?
I can squash it; in fact the change was introduced on "[v8,05/13] go.bbclass: remove some xxx_FINAL variables". Not sure if it is better or worse in this case. What do you think? > Also just RFC question, would it make sense to use: > > VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_bash ?= "bash" > RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev += "${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_bash}" > > instead of the bash dependency directly? If it's acceptable for oe-core I'll > create change to do it for all recipe (I don't mind waiting after 2.4 is > released). > > Because right now for reasons described in > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9217 I need to do the > above + > RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev_remove = "bash" > for many recipes with many bbappends, for our distro where we RPROVIDE bash > by busybox, which is good enough for package manager, but QA error is still > shown in cases where the real bash is built before the component rdpenending > on it. I'd be fine with this. It does make sense to allow the replacement of bash. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core