On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Andre McCurdy <armccu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just having the upgrade available to the community is useful, even if >> there are no guarantees or testing. I've backporting gcc 6.3 into my >> morty branch as it fixes build issues with musl. Morty with gcc 6.3 is >> not a combination which was ever officially supported or tested >> upstream, but I very much appreciate the fact that upgrading gcc 6.2 >> to 6.3 in morty only requires a few cherry-picks :-) > > I am open for if there are more like minded folks who think this will be a > good > thing to have. so all listening please chime in
I'd prefer for 2.5 time frame to drop gcc 6 as 2.4 can be seen as an upgrade path to it. If possible I'd prefer to add clang to oe-core than support multiple versions of gcc. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
